Saturday, 20 January 2018

Some shit to read

Ironically enough, Stalin's death - either by natural causes or at the hands of a Tito assassin - was largely his own doing.
 He ruled with such ruthlessness - executing anyone who stood in his way or defied his orders - that even his own security team was effectively paralysed with fear.
 On the day he suffered the stroke that would eventually kill him, he had given strict instructions that he was not to be disturbed.
 People who saw him on the day of his stroke, including his successor Nikita Khrushchev, said that he was showing no signs of ill health.
 After a meeting that lasted until 4am, Stalin went to bed and sent his guards off duty. They were under strict orders not to disturb him until they were called for.
 But, as the sun set that day, there had been no word from the Russian leader.
 Reports say that guards saw a light come on in Stalin's room at 6.30pm but there was still no word from the boss, and they were too frightened to break his orders.
 Eventually, at 10 pm, the guards decided that they had to enter the room. They found Stalin lying on the floor, unable to move or speak. His watch had broken and stopped at 6.30pm, suggesting a fall.
 For some reason, the guards did not immediately contact medical help.
 They first called the minister of state security, and then the secret police.
 They may have been following protocol but Mr Pirjavec agrees with other historians who claim the delay was intentional - using the time to cover-up or remove evidence.
 It did not help that Stalin had imprisoned many of his best physicians during an earlier purge.

This appeared in british media sex years ago, in the daily mail.

Is always good to read how the put some important things, so casual: "For some reason, the guards did not immediately contact medical help."
Why, as journalist, are going to talk about how from power positions within the state and party they dismantle the traditional protective system of Stalin and the people he had confidence and were in charge of it?
Why are they going to say that he wasn't dead when they discovered him laying in the floor and they wait till he died?
And then, of course, nothing suspicious of the people, discovering him lying in the floor and not calling straight away  the nearest doctor (and then whatever calls they want or have to make): They first called the minister of state security, and then the secret police.

In the  article they were trying to say that was Tito who killed (if was the case Stalin was killed ) him. We are to believe that a state like Yugoeslavia has something to do against a power like the USSR. Really?
Was not the KGB so powerful? And Stalin so much a dictator that saw everything? Again, seems very difficult, to put it soft, that if the USSR and its security apparatus was really in the business of blocking Tito's tries to kill him, the yugoeslavians would be able to get even close.

No, it seems yes, a conspiracy. Not only of Western but anti-communist elements (and their current with their leaders, that at the end, after Stalin was dead, took power) within the USSR and the party.





No comments:

Post a Comment