AN T- AR MOR

The Irish Holocaust

(to this and other similar things some people call it ProgreSS, 
just like today with the new techs and other...)

Just for fun: have the yellow Simpson a writer in the family?

Free the 2 Irish Republicans still Interned

Good news that Neil Hegarty is out.

We must remember that they are still 2 Irish Republicans interned by the Brits.

Apart of course, the rememberance of the rest of Irish Republican Political Prisoners of Portlaoise, Hydebank, Maghaberry and elsewhere

Gerry's

Where are the North Americans? the Europeans? the Zionists?
They are somewhere behind...

Some general thoughts

A historical Republican figure said some centuries ago that the rich always betrays the poor.

You can say something similar, and is, in real politics never trust your enemies and/or the enemies of your Cause (if your are for real of course). Sooner or later, they will always betray you, they will always try to undermine you or worse. Never follow them.

As and extension, you can also say that, if you want to improve and push your Cause in a good direction, a meaningful one, never play their games or accept their advises.

Is your enemy going to give you good advice? Are they going to give you or put proper resources or tools in your hands that really benefit you, your cause and undermine theirs? They are going to lead you in the good direction? Is a friend and an enemy the same?

Are the rich gonna share fairly and honestly their riches with the rest (they don't do that even with the people working or doing things for them!) one day, for no reason, just because they feel in the mood?

Differences... (an Irish politics case)

Always remember the An t-Ar Mor

Always remember the An t-Ar Mor

Remember everything and everyone (not only the victims but the british and all the actors that help them to carry it out, native or not)

For Justice and Truth.

Solidarity with the 3 Irish Republicans currently victims of British Internment

Tony Taylor

Gabriel Mackle

Neil Hegarty

FREE THEM NOW! FREE THE 3! END BRITISH INTERMENT OF IRISH REPUBLICANS!

Nazism (anti-communism) and Zionism are cousins

Solidarity with the Irish Republicans detained by the free state police in Dublin

SOLIDARITY WITH ALL IRISH REPUBLICANS ACTIVISTS VICTIMS OF STATE REPRESSION

Is not possible to keep defending and supporting the Provos and criticizing the results of the policies and strategies (South and North) that the endorse and actively encourage and support. 

Simply, impossible. Is a matter of congruence. For reason's sake 

(You can't really defend at the same time two oppose things, in any matter. Is a logical thing, really)

(image taken from the net)

Of course you can be non-communist but if you are anti-communist means that

- whatever you say or think you are close to fascism
- you have complete the first step of been a nazi
- you think that Marx, Engels, Trotsky, Mao, Ho Chi Minh, Lenin, Stalin are all the same and for the same ...and you keep deceiving yourself thinking of your "deep" analysis
- you are close to Zionism
- you are closer to Globalism that to National Liberation and Independence of the Nations of the world
-you fancy Empires and still talk about anti Globalism and anti Elites

- you are one o that really stupid types that say and defend that millionaires and a billionaire like George Soros can be a real communist! (only this is the prove of a deep ignorance and stupidity not of Communism, but of nearly everything)

Always remember the An t-Ar Mor

An t-Ar Mor,

the Irish Holocaust 

(map taken from

the I.H. page)

An Irish Hero

Rest In Peace

Honour and Glory, 

Saoirse

(JfF): some insalts

Just for Fun: same question, same answer, different result

The Provo succession in two pictures

(with its many overtones)

Just for Fun: What Irish city is this one?

(JfF) For breakfast...

Just for Fun: what does Meryl do?

PsfNI

Again, McT N does not give lessons but in 2018 saying "up the provos" and masquerading as a Republican?

Again, McT N does not give lessons but in 2018 saying "up the provos" and masquerading as a Republican? Please! 

Stop it. Not for you, as they say, do it for the kids!

We can read in a theoretically republican site this:

 I say boom boom boom let me hear you say Provo,
I say boom boom boom now everbody say Provo,
 Let me hear you say Provo
Let me hear you say Provo
Let, let, let me hear you say Proooovooo
Let me hear you say
Let me hear you say Provo

And then you put a funny little image of a fist and maybe a tricolour, and whow, pure Republicanis (sic)
And some people have the balls to say to some of us (the one that are not "they") that we are stock in the past.


Yes, hear someone say Provo,
and see, see the Provos and their deeds:

Third Way? No way! Provisional: an "Irish" third way?

Talking about politics and ideology have to involve an exercise of remembering, always. Politics without memory is nothing, or at least nothing good, constructive and really meaningful. Politics and memory is one. In other words, History. The present day situations and ideologies and ideas are a result of...so many things, starting with all what we have at our backs.

First look this photo. Maybe was done in purpose by the Provisionals PR people. Maybe it was just the photographer. Or maybe is just something casual. Anyway, let us use it as they use us and so many things, some of them sacred that are not suppose to be used but respected.

This photo. Seems ML is with her right arm extended, similar to a nazi-fascist-roman salute. Then Michelle seems as she is trying to give a close fist. Is so unnatural to them that is actually funny when they try, to talk only of the Provos, that they can't even do it properly, like with Londongerry and others.

Then we can say, both salutes, a fascist and leftist.
Anyway, lets us remember and develop the post more seriously. Let us look to History. No the recent one and to the not so long ago one.

Both, left and right? a mix of everything (meaning nothing then at the end)? This was call the Third Way. We go now to the pages of History. Do we remember Tony Blair? Yes, that magnificent brit politician and better person (by the way, converted to Catholicism is memory does not fail). Actually a close friend of Gerry and Martin, and for sure more in the Provos up apparatus.

Tony Blair was the leader of...the Third Way. The modern Third Way with that distinctive brit touch.

But what is the meaning of "The Third Way"? Who create it? For the answer of course we have to go back in History, again. And to Italy.

It was Benito Mussolini who, coming from the socialist camp, start to talk and develop the concept of Third Way. And the meaning was apparently clear: not capitalism (one way), no communism (a second way)...yes to the third way. The third way was Fascism. And fascism from there and then develop and mutated into the german fascism (Nazism) or was basically copied in the case of spanish fascists with a few brush strokes by the spaniards .

In other words, the Third Way basically means fascism. Of course nowadays fascism and fascists don't present themselves like in the '30s. But let us don't make mistakes, because they still have many, many of the same basic features: hate for real revolutionaries, hate for honest people with true alternatives, hate criticism, love cheating and lying, love power they can get, and love people with power (their master), they don't have morals, not limits if we are talking of developing their positions and achievements.

They are the best party, one of the best units of the system. And in the case of the Provos, they have one distinct weapon in the arsenal: they play with the myth that they are Republicans.

Is true that people should stop to call the SF. Provos or Provisionals, or at most PSF.  Keep calling them Sf from Republican quarters is doing them a favour.

Erin Go Bragh!

(The image above taken from

CnG page)

Just for Fun: John Lenin

(For fun but with respect)

Just for Fun: Mad Marx

Against the personality cult, anyone and anywhere

Nowadays it seems that more than personality cults we have egocentrism and selfishness. Egocentrism of some leaders and a lot of people that are like fans or groupies.

But not so long away it did exist widely. Most of it, as we know the phenomenon of this type of cult, within the communist international movement. But we can't  deceive ourselves, it did happens at other level or under other form within the anarchist movement, the socialists movement, here in Ireland, within the Republican Movement at some stages with some people.

Because there is a lot of hypocrisy like with a majority of anarchist, for example, not only when they talk that they don't have leaders, or flags...and then you point them their anarchist flags, and then they say that yes is a flag, but not like other flags...Or the socialists that complain about the cult of Stalin of course, not much or nothing of the cult of Lenin and for sure nothing at all of the cult of marx.

Or the very system itself when they critize the socialists and communists experiences, like the USSR, and they complain about the personality cult of their leaders. But then, time for the sports section of the news: personality cult of soccer players and others in other sports is not bad; or personality cults of some of their politicians, army personnel, scientists, researchers, journalist, singers. This cults are not bad. The socialists and communist are bad.

Of course McT N is against the personality cult and that does not mean the acknowledge of leaders, or the example set by past heroes, fighters or honest activist of course. Humans are not gods, then don't treat any one like gods that are incapable or mistake, that are perfect and so.

We have to acknowledge that different nations have different idiosyncrasies, cultural and political ways. That some things can be more ok or ok in some places and in others not so or not at all, of course talking from a basic level. Is not the same how we see things in Ireland in Cantabria in Congo in Italy in Russia, in Georgia, in Korea, Japan or Libya.

But treating people like gods no way! Not because who your are but because of your work and deeds the treatment should be. And again, not god like. Anyway whoever what to be treated like that says a lot, an not good (like some politicians, official and alternatives, singers, soccer players and so)

For example Stalin didn't like it much, and he said so in more than one occasion, going as far as saying that the cult around him was develop to latter attack him.

Look this video and see how happy he was.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YsL4HXZN9E

For sure, as he was a real revolutionary and communist, he wanted more to speak, to be heard and to make his points that to be cheer like the f.g Beatles.

The question, if why, good leader that survive him, and knew a little bit didn't take step to avoid that, like Enver Hoxha.

Anyway, is true they were other times, not all we see today could be seen then, and of course, again, humans are humans, we are not gods, therefore we can and make mistakes and we can be weak sometimes or at some points (of course not a excuse depending in what, when and the consequences  derivated of that weakness)

Very interesting videos of a russian general speaking

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJr1Evy57Jg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DeA9KcxRsA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyW-dHfxZn0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFonCd5-ANQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5YcIbHQIk4


Many very good points in them. In any case very interesting to watch.

McT thinks that maybe should w put some half naked chicks, some cars races or F1 races, some soccer math or some hollywood or british movie to level the balance

That funny things of the apparently more radical or deep left, socialist and communist

"The left" as a political concept is a very broad one. Really broad, but this is not the point of this post. The thing is that the more radical socialists (not the social-democrats the likes) and communists are located in the left of the political spectrum.

And the are socialist and socialists and communists and communists. With the more radical, so to speak (again, there is much to analyse, talk about, comment and critize historically and in the present), socialists and communists some things we find "funny things".

For example, very good and deep analysis, methods of developing that analysis, that are use till one point. Like if you are commenting a football, hurling or soccer match and you analyse one team, talk about their history, you dissect their capabilities, records and so, but then... you leave alone the other team, you don't comment, or you do so very superficially. 

The same in politics. They are people that call themselves communists (they display the language, the outlook, the use some of the XX century communist ways of thinking and-or methods)  that analyse very good some people, facts, theories and historical processes, they criticize them hardly (and rightly so in many cases) but then others, maybe because they are closer geographically to them,or the are fan of them or they have some kind of nearness.

The best example of all this is the myth of the spanish republic, its idealization. This happens of course in spain (the spanish leftists are unashamed promoters of this myth) but happens in other states of the world and nations.

Other example, is, surprise Cuba. We are going to resume with to photos. They one is taken from a so-call stalinist page

Then, what about him?

AND SOME PEOPLE STILL GOES AROUND COMPLAINING THAT THE PEOPLE DON'T GIVE A DAMN OF POLITICS. (MANY OF THEM HYPOCRITES THAT ARE COMPLICIT OF IT ACTUALLY) 

AND OTHERS STILL WONDERS WHY PEOPLE -ONE POWERFUL REASON ANYWAY- ARE TIRED OF POLITICS, WHY THEY ARE DISENCHANTED

Notice about political reading and videos that McT N posts

When McT N posts articles, videos,  political lectures and so, it does not means that necessarily agrees with the all content of them, a lot, a little or with nothing.

If there is no comment of them, or analysis, then you can guess McT N position, if guessing what others are thinking is more important for you that thinking and preparing yourself. Can be both of course, but for McT more important is the latter.

This posts have one primary goal, achieved or not: to make people think by themselves, to broad the knowledge and so on.

Of course  McT N have an opinion that can be included or not in the posts, as said before.

Political readings: J.Stalin and Industrialization

   “Some comrades think that industrialization implies the development of any kind of industry. There are even some queer fellows who believe that Ivan the Terrible was an industrialist, because in his day he created certain embryonic industries. If we follow this line of argument, then Peter the Great should be styled the first industrialist. That, of course, is untrue. Not every kind of industrial development is industrialisation. The centre of industrialisation, the basis for it, is the development of heavy industry (fuel, metal, etc.), the development, in the last analysis, of the production of the means of production, the development of our own machine-building industry. Industrialisation has the task not only of increasing the share of manufacturing industry in our national economy as a whole; it has also the task, within this development, of ensuring economic independence for our country, surrounded as it is by capitalist states, of safeguarding it from being converted into an appendage of world capitalism. Encircled as it is by capitalism, the land of the dictatorship of the proletariat cannot remain economically independent if it does not itself produce instruments and means of production in its own country, if it remains stuck at a level of development where it has to keep its national economy tethered to the capitalistically developed countries, which produce and export instruments and means of production. To get stuck at that level would be to put, ourselves in subjection to world capital.
     Take India. India, as everyone knows, is a colony. Has India an industry? It undoubtedly has. Is it developing? Yes, it is. But the kind of industry developing there is not one which produces instruments and means of production. India imports its instruments of production from Britain. Because of this (although, of course, not only because of this), India’s industry is completely subordinated to British industry. That is a specific method of imperialism—to develop industry in the colonies in such a way as to keep it tethered to the metropolitan country, to imperialism.
     But it follows from this that the industrialisation of our country cannot consist merely in the development of any kind of industry, of light industry, say, although light industry and its development are absolutely essential for us. It follows from this that industrialisation is to be understood above all as the development of heavy industry in our country, and especially of our own machine-building industry, which is the principal nerve of industry in general. Without this, there can be no question of ensuring the economic independence of our country.”
 

 

  J. Stalin, from 

“The Economic Situation of the Soviet Union and the Policy of the Party”

Freedom-Justice- Independence for all nations and therefore their peoples - Wake up...or suffer the consecuences

Nationalism against Globalism (does not matter the State that leads)

Revolutionary Patriotism against complicit revisionism-reformism (does not matter how radical they try to present themselves)

Naturalism (true respect to Mother Nature and intelligent, sensible use of her resources) and true Humanism (the one that respect and remembers the human link with nature, other beings of the planet and Life) against this general madness. robotic-new tech dictatorship and its immorality  

Don't you think is strange?

Maybe is not, but one could not help and think that something are strange like:

- all the socialist leaders and magnates of east-europe so fancy of the brits and the west in general
- all that so-call communist and soviet so fan of the US so-call culture (hollywood and so)
- all the caribbean, central and south-american socialists leaders and magnates so fan and so friendly with their former masters, let it be spanish, british adn others.
- the close and deep relationship between Fidel Castro and the spanish king  Juan Carlos I (yes, the one that was selected and put in place by Franco)
- that the revisionist USSR sold oil to spain, in the sixties, during franco regime
- that the late Muammar Gaddafi send his son Saif to London to study and learn management.(but in this case he already paid MG because part of the problem in Libya, not all but quite a big part, was the winds, modern-brit winds of course, that Saif brought with him that poison and weak from inside the libuan state and leadership)
- that past leader of the PR of Korea sent his son to Europe to study and learn (at the moment there he is, and they are defending the country, but building a ski resort and malls in a PR, really?)

The months: January, February,

March,