Against the Catholic Church and against LGTB/femi-nazi orgs

Some questions:
How many priests are gay?

How many catholic priest with their abuse had push boys to be gays?

How many LGTB people believe and follow the Church?
How many people voting for the Yes then follow the Church in "spiritual" (spirit and church are just not part of the same equation, different unrelated things) matters or better to say religious. Quite a few...

BOTH ARE AGENTS OF GLOBALIZATION
BOTH ARE WINGS OF THE SAME BIRD
BOTH ARE ENEMIES OF THE NATIVE NATIONS AND THE NATURAL WAYS 

(for clarification when McT N says "Natural" is the natural...that derives from Nature (...and naturality, naturalness, indigenous, thruthful; because the human being is not a selfish, cunning, cynic and unthinking hypocrite  in normal and natural environment and proper education-if was as today the nations wouldn't be ancient...) 

Therefore Natural ways, the ways opposed to all the plastic ways, artificial, capitalistic, greedy, cunning, hypocritical, non-native, globalist ways.
The ways of the Church and many of their allies, and the ways of LGTB orgs and femi-nazis)

And there is another aspect of Church-LGTB-Femi-nazi. They are forefronts to different actors but not opposite. That why they have some different features. Despite this the work and go in parallel.
Is better to say that they are three different stand of the same shop.

In the south of Ireland the System wanted the Yes to be the result and they have it. Despite apparently be not the case, all this three actors have a big share in the responsibility of winning.
Yes, the Church, that apparently was oppose to the Yes ...has a big part in this result.
As said, many actors around trying to gain for the consequences of it. Many people and organizations are going to try to catch here now. Shamelessly of course.

First of all, the Catholic Church, that even they stood for the No, is one of the main reason, through their history and action, that so many Irish Irish citizens have vote Yes. Because they thought doing so was voting against the Church.  The Church knew this of course.And if the were really interest in the result to be a No, they would have go out and clearly stated that even if they were supporting the No (McT Ndon't trust them, don't listen to them) it surely was not a Church thing or even religious issue (at least not only, because it was not for many many people,and for sure many people for the No were not church friendly). They Church is not stupid. They knew the feeling of so many people. And they knew that many many people themselves relate the No to them. And you have so many of the Yes camp day after day relating the No to them . They knew that if they go out clearly to disassociate the NO from the Church they would benefit the NO. They did not. This shows that, as usual, the Church is a enterprise that use things to the enterprise benefit, for their own gain. They didn't care about the No winning, unlike other people that did work for their NO within their possibilities and resources. This shows the hypocrisy of both the Yes and the Church. And the System happy as hell.For them is a Win/Win situation.

Now the Church will come to collect and regain support. They would say that they were for the NO whole-hearted. If was the case they would have do that. Because again, many individuals, propaganda and organizations of the Yes, linking the No to the Church.And doing so from the knowledge that this would harm the No position. If the church was whole-hearted for the winning of the No, they would have take the courage and dignity for once and put their own interest and agenda at least the second. They did not. And again, now they will cover their hypocrisy and try to rebuild their prestige or regain some support, knowing as the know that won't be as in the past. If the Church regains support who will be the first sectors and ideals affected: yes, the Irish Republican and true Republicanism.

A funny thing the Provos, so pro-Church was for the Yes. Their pals of the Church for the No.Both anti-Irish and anti-Republican. They will try inf the future to make a clamp against them.

To say about the Provos. This was a test for Marie-Lou. Or more precisely, now Marie-Lou the anti-Irish and anti-Republican leader of the west-brit agents that the Provos are will be able to pose as champion of the Yes, champion of fairness and justice, defender of women. To be fair, the Provo stance and deep involvement in the Yes, with even internal problems for them at the start of the campaign, is very relevant, and their part is quite a big part for the Yes to win. Nationalists, not only Republican should have this in mind.


In the other hand, for sure they will come some actors, like the National Party and other quasi-fascist or fascist parties or groups of people to try to gain support for them. They will blame foreigners, and for sure, as this kind of people do, will go to people easily recognizable. And this means yes, foreigners of dark skin, and the first and the most that will be signal will be blacks, but africans. We have to remember that many Arabs are categorize dark skin and themselves are really anti-African.

The nazi and fascist shit (apart of the direct agents of the System that leads themand a couple of able speaker they would have), are by definition really simpletons. They are not going to try to have really deep thoughts or analysis.The go to for the easy answer. And to be fair, not only them this days.
Like with the video above: they call the english rat... african. Only because the color, and a remotely african hat? Don't go and listen to hear, and only with this you realize that she is more english that the queen.

And to finish, is more than funny to read a lot of the Yes camp supporters.If someone takes the job of reading a little bit around the Net (we don't say nothing about listening and/or talking out there in the real world!) will see that many of the people supporting the No, criticizing the yes, are not pro-Church ...but the Yes people keep talking and coming back with the Church stuff. The claim to be very open, of course very good, to listen, to think a lot...but they do not. Like the Church. Some try to portrait as that they listen, even not even that, they don't give a fuck about what the other person is trying to explain, they don't go to deep in the debate, and they repeat their lines, again and again.
This people, whatever they pose as left-wing, socialist, communist, anti-imperialist, even republicans, women defender...are really no good. Actually ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM. Simple as that. because

http://mactirenaisiunalwaysgreen.blogspot.com/2018/05/shame-on-you-anti-african-people.html

By the way, Church, LGTB and Femin-nazis are active workers in the social engineering campaign. Of course the C. Church is the oldest organization. But again, down the decades and even centuries...how many altar boys become gay thanks to priests? how many boys -and girls- were made gay in the male and female abbeys?

Completely different result as we can see

The LGTB after the IIWW with many of the male nazis having to change tactics and so, start to develop. Here we have to remember that, for example, in the '30 and '40 they were all in the same boat. The boat against Native Nations, Communism and the USSR. Hitler was gay, Franco was gay, the Chruch supported them...to just give a clear, important example.

Social engineering is not Good - Globalization is social engineering - Globalization is against the Native Nations of the World.

STAND UP AGAINST IMPERIALISM AND CAPITALISM
STAND UP AGAINST NAZISM
STAND UP AGAINST SOCIAL  ENGINEERING

STOP GLOBALIZATION
RESPECT AND DEFEND NATURE AND NATURAL-HUMAN WAYS 


(everyones choice)


::::::::::::::::::::::::::

McT N has no problems with Christians, true Jews or gay people, 

McT N HAS a problem with the Catholic Church,  Zionism and the LGTB/femi-nazi "agenda",

do we get it?

THIS IS LIKE THIS BECAUSE McT N IS BASICALLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY 
ANTI-NAZI.

And McT N doesn't care of what face or dress Nazim wear, or the color of it.

NAZISM IS NAZISM, WHATEVER THE FRONTAGE, VERSION OR MODEL

WE ARE FOR THE NATURAL WAYS AND THE NATIVE NATIONS OF THE WORLD

do we get it?

McT N can't be more explicit. People that don't get it is not the problem of McT N. 

They both had and have this mentality:

http://mactirenaisiunalwaysgreen.blogspot.com/2018/06/i-really-like-but-you-have-to-change.html
BECAUSE THEY WORDS SAY SOMETHING AND GO IN ONE DIRECTION BUT THEIR ACTIONS SAY SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT AND GO IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION (and that not good in anyone or any organization)



http://mactirenaisiunalwaysgreen.blogspot.com/2018/06/some-of-consequences-that-surely-are.html