When the Media, the cool left and super-feminists talk about prostitution (why they never talk about the gay prostitution or the prostitution of the soul?)

Why when they talked and denounce prostitution, they never see the one that shines the most, the most expensive and the closest to them?

There are few thing more ugly and disgusting that false moral, and fake moralist.  Cheating using sensitive issues, manipulating using the feeling and so. Happens a lot. But much more this days. Myave has nothing to do with all the new-techs and device that surround us, and the modern ultra-tech way of life. But it really seems that time ago, the word of the people had more value. That they wer dishonest of course, but many more honest people. Now seems everything is ok. Everything can be use, bought or manipulate. McT N still believes firmly is not, and will not be the case. Will be, yes, but won’t be good or acceptable.  Now it seem that everything is like a twit or a facebook comment: you say something, then you can easily edit it and it will be forgotten what was said first, or simple delete them.

We saw the news of Belfast and the raids and seizures on the IRSM. The brothel  stuff.  And that’s why mention  false moral, and fake moralist. The issue of prostitution is a very old and recurrent one.

To try to make it short. There are many kinds of prostitution, many forms and for many reasons.

Why they never seize or say nothing or denounce the male prostitution, and more the gay prostitution. Or we don’t think that in the male gay community and people around exist huge pockets of prostitutes, many of them by the way of very young age. What about this? Excuse us, but someone will answer, someone will talk about this…

Let's summarize. For Mc T N there are two type of prostitution (be  the prostitutes male or female, straight or gay, old and young, but when you go down in age there can be more problem there obviously), or better put anyone can engage in two kinds of prostitution: physical or spiritual.

You can sell (or rent) your body…AND YOUR SOUL. And the Media, the cool left, the trendy people, the super-feminist won’t never talk about this.

For McT N the prostitution of the soul is far more worse than the prostitution of the body.

Because this when some people talk about poor people, homesless, travellers, poor farmers and so. Always the same answer from Mc T N point of view: better to be dirty outside, to have mud in the body than be dirty inside, to have a dirty soul. Better to be poor or have less material things that to be poor spirituality speaking.

This is the same. Some people sell their body, as has been done for centuries. But here, we are using even their language. Is not selling, not even renting. We are talking about sexual favours in exchange of whatever the payment will be, quantity, quality, type of.

If no one are forcing them,  talking about the ones offering the sexual favours, gay or not, male or female…where is the real problem? Is their problem, and the families, friends or whatever if they don’t like that economic activity. But, if there is no force by others involve…there is no real problem. We can like it or not, ok. But nothing in the region of the language and the campaigns that all the cheaters with this issue use and develop. And as said: the always talk about the same. Never about gay prostituting, never about the actors and actress that engage in prostitution (even if it’s for the cause, their ugly cause!), the journalist male and female. Or the ones that operate in the rich neighbors. Or the respectable men and women that before being so, they had that activity.

And then we can talk about the fact that many people don’t prostitute themselves for many, but for favours, to develop their careers and so.

Many of this people will be the fiercest critic of the women (as said the never talk about men or gays) of popular classes selling sexual favours. And they won’t recognize their same, their similar behaviour, in other context and scenario, as that.