"A nation may, for instance, determine, as the free Irish nation determined and enforced for many centuries, that private ownership shall not exist in land; that the whole of a nation's soil is the public property of the nation. A nation may determine, as many modern nations have determined, that all the means of transport within a nation, all its railways and waterways, are the public property of the nation to be administered by the nation for the general benefit. A nation may go further and determine that all sources of wealth whatsoever are the property of the nation, that each individual shall give his service for the nation's good, and shall be adequately provided for by the nation, and that all surplus wealth shall go to the national treasury to be expended on national purposes, rather than be accumulated by private persons."
- Pádraig Pearse
Communism derives from common, from community. The People of a Nation, the communities were not stupid! If we listen to the propaganda it seems impossible to understand how they managed to live for hundreds and thousands of year. they did, and they did properly, with rules, duties and rights,a free order of society, a natural one.
And even after the industrial revolution and till recently many of that old features were to be seen in the society.
Communism is not the brain child or invention of Marx and Engels.
And this is one of the victories of the system. Thinking that common property of the land for example, the main rich of a nation, and national and public ownership of some things for the common good is something new, that is a invention of some fellas. Trying to say that private ownership by elites and some rich associates, the churchs landlordism , the industrial revolution and the tech-revolution that makes the elites more powerful is the natural development of human kind. That proper rules and common ownership of basic things was never the case, that as the many
The opposite is the case.
And this is one of the victories of the system. Thinking that common property of the land for example, the main rich of a nation, and national and public ownership of some things for the common good is something new, that is a invention of some fellas. Trying to say that private ownership by elites and some rich associates, the churchs landlordism , the industrial revolution and the tech-revolution that makes the elites more powerful is the natural development of human kind. That proper rules and common ownership of basic things was never the case, that as the many
The opposite is the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment